Here is Open Space Program from Clare's site
and proof Clare correctly lists my allegations that Pam Brown received
favorable treatment in her development, except I never claimed she
cut down 'vast' numbers of 'specimen trees', I said "She chopped
down trees which housed deer, squirrels and owls" and I referred to
"stately looking pines 70' tall". I made no mention of vast
numbers nor of specimen trees. Clare is again misrepresenting the
issue by misquoting me.
I also never claimed that
there was a minimum lot size for TDR's, I said 'generally speaking' there was a minimum lot size, and therefore Pam received
favorable treatment. And of course no one expressed concerns
about the fairness in connection with the people she mentions because
there was nothing wrong or underhand about these transactions! See my email.
did NOT have the right to build an accessory dwelling. It may
well be that all of the township's TDR agreements allow accessory
dwellings but Pam signed an additional document agreeing not to build
any further dwellings on the property.
I have no idea why she signed this agreement, but sign it she
most certainly did.
Since she did not have the right to build
any further dwelling it is not really relevant whether the building was
of appropriate size under the accessory dwelling size regulations.
But on top of lack of any right to build it WAS larger than would
have been permitted. There was no confusing language. For more information see here.
I suspect Barry
DiLibero's lack of objections at the time may have been because he was
not aware of the covenants existing on the property. Indeed, this
covenant was only discovered when someone prompted my interest and
further investigation by accusing me of unfairly attacking Pam Brown.
far as cutting trees down goes I never suggested it was illegal or that
they were specimen trees. Clare seems frequently to divert any
line of attack by claiming things I didn't say. I simply asked whether it was
normal for a conservationalist to cut down so many trees. Conservationalists generally like to conserve things.
not know anything about Jeff Hester and Tom Helwig removing
trees apart from what I have read on Clare's site. I have never seen the sawmill invoice and it certainly
never appeared in one of my newsletters.
As to the aerial shots
of Pam's property. Wow! They were taken from Google, and as
far as being stupid goes, I think Clare is being really stupid in
thinking that ANYONE could fail to notice that one shot was in full
leaf and the other before the trees had leafed out.
Here are before and after photos showing the area of the new house.
can anyone really tell me the only difference between the two is
because the trees had more leaves in one photo than the other?
(Here are the before and after photos showing all the property)
Back to my list of Clare's pages